The fact that there have been so many plausible theories put out about why Interflora got penalised says a lot about how far over the line they’d gone with their SEO recently.
Irish wonder picked up on the fact that Interflora appeared to be using their own network of sites to inflate links. Oh dear.
There have also been rumblings about the frankly ludicrous number of pages on the Interflora website optimised for terms like “location+flowers”. They have about 1800 partners in the UK, but felt the need to have around 25,000 almost identical pages covering flower delivery in pretty much every conceivable neighbourhood in the country. D’oh.
Of course, given the recent Google update about advertorials by Matt Cutts, we can make a pretty good guess which of the different theories is most likely.
On the surface, the common factor in these putative reasons for Interflora having their arses handed to them is that they were done to excess: Too many blogs; too many advertorials; too many websites in a network; too many pages.
This wasn’t a cheap piece of spam. I had a guy from the same advertorial network as we see in the Interflora link profile offering me 200 advertorials across his network for £80 each. The 150 placements in the purported network would have cost ~£12,000. Wissam linked from Martin MacDonald’s blog to a set of search results with 41 blogs linking to Interflora and including the text “So Interflora contacted me…” . That’s probably the tip of the iceberg. Let’s assume that Interflora’s agency managed to get around 100 bloggers on board, and gave them the equivalent of a £25 bunch of flowers. That’s £2.5K
IrishWonder found references to around 5k domains owned by a holding company that were part of the Interflora back link network. Ignoring the hosting costs of those and picking a figure of £5 per domain for annual registration out of my arse, that suggests about £25K for owning the domains.
Our running total for link building so far is £39,500 without taking into account the time and effort needed to write content for advertorials, negotiate with bloggers, do the admin on domains, and do all of the other important SEO stuff. It’s probably around the same again.
Interflora then have probably paid around £80K to get themselves up to number 1 for flowers before getting bent over and taking the punishment. During Feburary there are probably about a quarter of a million searches for the term “flowers” – please correct me below… Interflora probably cleaned up around 30% CTR from that because they’re a well known brand, and probably converted at about 5%, with a decent average order value of around £25 you get: £1.9 million. Nice…
Except, Interflora don’t earn that. Local florists take a slice for making up the bunches and delivering them and here are costs of doing business – staff, raw materials, computers, office space, stuff like that. And marketing.
And this is the point.
All of the stuff that Interflora (or their seo agency*) were doing was expensive, but it wasn’t as expensive as it would have been to do things properly.
Rather than creating fantastic content and working with journalists to earn a place on authority news sites, Interflora bought their way in.
Rather than do something amazing for all of their customers in the hope that some might say something nice, they faked it.
Rather than create great content on their site, they auto-generated a fucktonne of crappy pages to target keywords that no-one searches for.
Rather than be the kind of business that attracts links naturally,they build a shit load of crappy websites, and pretended that they were popular.
Interflora spent a tonne of cash on pretending to be popular. And disappointingly, no-one really talked about that.
I loved working in SEO. I love the community, the people, and the thrill, but to be honest, the schadenfreude at Interflora disappoints me. As does the “there but for the grace of god” sentiment.
It disappoints me that we’ve allowed ourselves to prostitute ourselves to clients who want to take shortcuts to success. Who want to pretend to be popular when they’re not, who want to hide that they’re shit, or treat customers like scum, or commit fraud.
There is no such thing as an ethical SEO. Because no-one working in SEO is even prepared to be honest with themselves.
I work for an agency. This is my opinion. Not theirs.
* You have no idea how tempted I was to put a keyword rich link in here…
- March 2013 (1)
- February 2013 (1)
- November 2012 (1)
- August 2012 (1)
- June 2012 (1)
- May 2012 (3)
- April 2012 (1)
- March 2012 (2)
- February 2012 (3)
- January 2012 (3)
- December 2011 (3)
- November 2011 (6)
- October 2011 (6)
- September 2011 (8)
- August 2011 (6)
- July 2011 (6)
- June 2011 (9)
- May 2011 (11)
- April 2011 (16)
- March 2011 (24)
- February 2011 (27)
- January 2011 (9)
Join Quumf on Facebook
James Lowery on Twitter
- Back at work in the UK. I brought chocolates. They've all gone.2013/05/12 22:16
- Back in the office. Time to do some SEO, or something.2013/04/25 21:33
- Hey @google #ifihadglass I'd be able to spellcheck adverts before they get published.
- Just had my laptop lovingly rebuilt by @MattTipler. Going to see if I can restrict myself to Bing + IE for a week.2013/04/19 03:03
- Ihggggnnsuithlmnfmnggvuhyeeyeueyeuisquwuysyewueuueyyeyeytwttwwtryeyeywyetwfatwftyrryryewyyqytttttyytyyauuyerrydyysyseyeyryteagwyeehwgwuwyy2013/04/05 20:37
- Back at work in the UK. I brought chocolates. They've all gone.
Tagsadsense analytics bit.ly Black Hat black hat SEO branding business celebrities conversation conversion rates diabetes egypt Facebook forums foursquare getting a return Google Google +1 Link building linking marketing message boards microsoft msn online pr optimisation Personal politeness politics privacy profitability ROI SEO sharing Social 101 Social Media social media marketing social media response social networks spam spammers statistics traffic generation twitter url shorteners